top of page
Open Book Table

Refrences

See below for a list of interdisciplinary refrences

 

American Psychological Association, Harris Poll (2020). Outcome of presidential election offers little stress relief

American Psychiatric Association (2024).

 

3. While most Americans align with close family members on controversial political issues, one in five report family estrangement based on these topics, October 3, 2025

Bakker, B. N., & Lelkes, Y. (2024). Putting the affect into affective polarisation. Cognition and Emotion, 38(4), 418–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2362366

Canady, V. A. (2020). 2020 presidential election more stressful than 2016 race. In Mental Health Weekly (Vol. 30, Number 39, pp. 7–7). Wiley Periodicals, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/mhw.32539

Ettman, C. K., Hatton, C. R., Castrucci, B. C., & Galea, S. (2024). Mental Health and Mental Health Care Utilization Across Political Affiliation in U.S. Adults. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 31(1), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002050

Green, T.V. (2021) Republicans and Democrats alike say it’s stressful to talk politics with people who disagree, Pew Research Center poll, November 23, 2021

Hill, C. E., Knox, S., & Pinto-Coelho, K. G. (2018). Therapist Self-Disclosure and Immediacy: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 55(4), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000182

4. Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038

5. Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034

Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Newman, B. (2020). Intellectual humility in the sociopolitical domain. Self and Identity, 19(8), 989–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1714711

Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Newman, B. (2021). Sociopolitical intellectual humility as a predictor of political attitudes and behavioral intentions. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5553

Levendusky, M. S. (2018). Americans, Not Partisans: Can Priming American National Identity Reduce Affective Polarization? The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1086/693987

National Association of Social Workers (2021), Code of ethics

 

Peterson, Z. D. (2002). More Than a Mirror: The ethics of therapist self-disclosure. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 39(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.39.1.21

2. Silver, L., Keeter, S., Kramer, S., Lippert, J., Ramones, S. H., Cooperman, A., Baronavski, C., Webster, B., Nadeem, R., Chavda, J. (2025). Americans’ trust in one another, Pew Research Center.

Shearer, E. (2025). Most Americans say Republican and Democratic voters cannot agree on basic facts, Pew Research Center, July 30, 2025

7. Redding, R. E. (2020). Sociopolitical Values: The Neglected Factor in Culturally- Competent Psychotherapy. In Prejudice, Stigma, Privilege, and Oppression (pp. 427–445). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35517-3_24

Rosenwald, M. (2006).

 

A Part versus Apart: The Relationship between Social Workers’ Political Ideology and Their Professional Affiliation. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 3(2)

6. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204

1. U.S .Public Health Service (2023) Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation : the U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on the healing effects of social connection and community, P.44

Welker, K. M., Duong, M., Rakhshani, A., Dieffenbach, M., Coleman, P., & Haidt, J. (2023). The online educational program ‘Perspectives’ improves affective polarization, intellectual humility, and conflict management. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 11(2), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.10651

bottom of page