top of page
Open Book Table

Refrences

See below for a list of interdisciplinary refrences

​

 

American Psychological Association, Harris Poll (2020). Outcome of presidential election offers little stress relief

American Psychiatric Association (2024).

 

3. While most Americans align with close family members on controversial political issues, one in five report family estrangement based on these topics, October 3, 2025

​

Bakker, B. N., & Lelkes, Y. (2024). Putting the affect into affective polarisation. Cognition and Emotion, 38(4), 418–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2362366

​​​

Canady, V. A. (2020). 2020 presidential election more stressful than 2016 race. In Mental Health Weekly (Vol. 30, Number 39, pp. 7–7). Wiley Periodicals, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/mhw.32539

​

Ettman, C. K., Hatton, C. R., Castrucci, B. C., & Galea, S. (2024). Mental Health and Mental Health Care Utilization Across Political Affiliation in U.S. Adults. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 31(1), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002050

​

Green, T.V. (2021) Republicans and Democrats alike say it’s stressful to talk politics with people who disagree, Pew Research Center poll, November 23, 2021

​

Hill, C. E., Knox, S., & Pinto-Coelho, K. G. (2018). Therapist Self-Disclosure and Immediacy: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 55(4), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000182

​

4. Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038

​

5. Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034

​

Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Newman, B. (2020). Intellectual humility in the sociopolitical domain. Self and Identity, 19(8), 989–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1714711

​

Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Newman, B. (2021). Sociopolitical intellectual humility as a predictor of political attitudes and behavioral intentions. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5553

​

Levendusky, M. S. (2018). Americans, Not Partisans: Can Priming American National Identity Reduce Affective Polarization? The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1086/693987

​

National Association of Social Workers (2021), Code of ethics

 

Peterson, Z. D. (2002). More Than a Mirror: The ethics of therapist self-disclosure. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 39(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.39.1.21

​

2. Silver, L., Keeter, S., Kramer, S., Lippert, J., Ramones, S. H., Cooperman, A., Baronavski, C., Webster, B., Nadeem, R., Chavda, J. (2025). Americans’ trust in one another, Pew Research Center.

​

Shearer, E. (2025). Most Americans say Republican and Democratic voters cannot agree on basic facts, Pew Research Center, July 30, 2025

​

7. Redding, R. E. (2020). Sociopolitical Values: The Neglected Factor in Culturally- Competent Psychotherapy. In Prejudice, Stigma, Privilege, and Oppression (pp. 427–445). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35517-3_24

Rosenwald, M. (2006).

 

A Part versus Apart: The Relationship between Social Workers’ Political Ideology and Their Professional Affiliation. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 3(2)

​

6. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204

​

1. U.S .Public Health Service (2023) Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation : the U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on the healing effects of social connection and community, P.44

​

Welker, K. M., Duong, M., Rakhshani, A., Dieffenbach, M., Coleman, P., & Haidt, J. (2023). The online educational program ‘Perspectives’ improves affective polarization, intellectual humility, and conflict management. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 11(2), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.10651

bottom of page